What Your Emotions Are Trying to Tell You: A Stoic Guide

What your emotions are trying to tell you is one of the questions Stoicism is most useful for, and also one of the most misunderstood. Most people assume Stoicism wants us to ignore emotions, push them aside, or become the kind of person who simply does not feel things too strongly. That is not what the Stoics were teaching. It is almost the opposite.
The Stoics wanted us to examine our emotions, not suppress them. To look underneath the reaction and ask what is actually going on. That examination is where the real work is, and it is where the most useful information about ourselves tends to live.
When I look back at how I used to react to things, a message on my phone, a boss walking around the corner, any situation where I felt judged or uncertain, the reaction was fast, heavy, and it would stay with me for a long time. The rumination, the overthinking, the anxiety about how I was being perceived. That was not the emotion itself. That was what I was adding to it.
Stoicism Does Not Suppress Emotions. It Examines Them.
The idea that Stoicism is about repressing emotions is one of the most common and least accurate things said about the philosophy. Stoicism is a Socratic philosophy, and Socrates was clear: the unexamined life is not worth living. If you suppress your emotions rather than examine them, you are not being Stoic. You are being blind.
The Stoic goal is not apatheia in the sense of emotional numbness. Apatheia means freedom from destructive passions, not the absence of feeling. Marcus Aurelius wrote that we should be free from passion but full of love. That full of love part matters. The Stoics absolutely recognised good emotions, what they called eupatheiai: joy, goodwill, caution. These are emotions grounded in accurate judgments rather than false ones. They are not only permitted in Stoicism. They are the goal.
What Stoicism pushes back against is the destructive kind: the anger that takes us over, the excessive grief that paralyses us, the fear that distorts our judgment. And the reason it pushes back is not that these feelings are shameful. It is that they are based on false beliefs. Fix the belief, and the emotion changes.
If you want to go deeper into the philosophical framework behind this, the conversation with Professor Margaret Graver, one of the world’s leading experts on Stoic psychology, covers it in exceptional detail.
How Emotions Actually Work According to the Stoics
The Stoic model of emotion begins with an impression. Something happens in the world, and it lands on our minds. The Stoics called this a phantasia: the raw appearance of an event before we have added anything to it. The impression arrives whether we want it to or not.
Almost immediately, our previous beliefs and experiences attach themselves to that impression. If we see our boss walking toward us, and we have had a boss in the past who was difficult or unpredictable, our body reacts before our mind has even processed what is happening. Palms sweat. Heart rate shifts. A sense of dread arrives. These are what the Stoics called propatheia, pre-emotions: the involuntary first movements that happen before we have made any judgment at all. Even the sage experiences these. They are not a failure of Stoic practice. They are simply human.
What happens next is where our agency lies. If we then add a judgment to that impression, if we tell ourselves “this is terrible, my boss is going to be angry, something bad is about to happen,” that judgment turns the pre-emotion into a full-fledged pathos. A destructive passion that takes us away from our reason and makes it very hard to act well.
But if we pause before adding that judgment, if we give ourselves a moment to look at the impression and ask what is actually here, we can change what follows. The boss is walking over. That is the fact. Everything else is what we brought to it.
"When something happens, we instantly see it, it leaves an impression on us. Our previous beliefs and experiences immediately attach a feeling towards that. So if you see someone who has authority over you, your boss comes around, you might feel nervous, your palms might get sweaty. These are part of the pre-emotion. There's nothing you can do about it. But after that comes where our agency lies."
Benny Voncken, Via Stoica Podcast, What Your Emotions Are Trying to Tell You (06:24)
Emotions as Information: The Stoic Update
The Stoics called emotions judgments: responses that arise from what we believe about a situation. But there is a practical extension of that idea that is particularly useful today. If an emotion is rooted in a belief, then the emotion is telling us something about the belief. And if we can read that information clearly, we can start to understand ourselves far better.
Back to the boss example. The nervous reaction to seeing a figure of authority is not random. It is pointing at something: a previous experience where authority meant danger, or a belief that our work is never quite good enough, or a deeper fear about being seen and judged. That reaction is information about us, not just a response to them.
Once we understand where an emotional reaction is coming from, two things happen. First, it loses some of its force. We are no longer at the mercy of a reaction we do not understand. Second, it gives us something to work with: a belief worth examining, a pattern worth questioning, an area where our picture of the world may not match what is actually true.
This is where the Stoic practice of assent becomes practical. The moment between impression and response, the moment where we either give our agreement to the impression and let it become a full emotion, or we pause and examine it, that is where the real Stoic work happens. And it is also where the most useful information about ourselves tends to live.
What the Stoic Pause Actually Does
The pause is not a technique for becoming less emotional. It is a tool for creating enough space between stimulus and response to actually see what is happening. One breath. One moment of epochē, suspension of judgment, before the reaction takes over completely.
What changes in that space is not the emotion itself but our relationship to it. We go from being inside the reaction to being able to look at it. And from that position we can ask: what is this telling me? What judgment am I adding? Is that judgment accurate, or is it coming from a belief that belongs to a different situation entirely?
I have noticed over the years of Stoic practice that this does not make me feel less. It has made me feel more clearly. Less lost in reactions I do not understand, more aware of what is actually happening and what I actually want to do about it. My interactions with people have become more honest and more present because I am no longer spending most of my attention managing a reaction rather than paying attention to the person in front of me.
"As a consequence, I don't feel like I've become more cold or more distant. I feel like I've been able to connect better with people because I'm looking at the situation for what it really is. I'm able to listen to them, to be there with them, to pay them my full attention."
Benny Voncken, Via Stoica Podcast, What Your Emotions Are Trying to Tell You (16:25)
How to Read Your Emotions Like a Stoic
This is not a process that requires perfection or even much time. It can begin with a few honest questions, asked either in the moment or in reflection afterwards. The Stoic approach to emotions has always been practical rather than theoretical: not a system to admire but a set of tools to use.
Start by naming the emotion. Not explaining it, not justifying it, just naming it: I feel angry, I feel anxious, I feel hurt. That simple act of naming already creates a small distance between you and the reaction.
Then ask what actually happened: the event itself, stripped of interpretation. The boss walked around the corner. A message arrived. A plan changed. These are facts. Everything else is what we brought.
Then ask what you added: what did the event mean to you, and why? What belief or previous experience made this particular impression feel significant? This is where the information lives. Not in the event, but in the gap between the event and our response to it.
Finally, ask what this is pointing at: what values, fears, or beliefs are underneath this reaction? Not to judge them, but to understand them. And from that understanding, the next time something similar happens, you will be slightly better placed to see it coming and choose your response more deliberately. This is also something that Stoic decision-making depends on: when we understand what is driving our reactions, we can make cleaner choices.
"If you really need anger to make change, you don't believe in it strongly enough. If something is what you really want to do, you wouldn't need anger. Because anger often leads to actions that are regretful, that might actually be counterproductive. But if you can make the right moves, do the right actions out of reason and logic, it will be far more impactful."
Benny Voncken, Via Stoica Podcast, What Your Emotions Are Trying to Tell You (21:12)
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Stoicism say we should suppress our emotions?
No. This is one of the most persistent misconceptions about Stoic philosophy. The Stoics never advocated suppression. As a Socratic philosophy, Stoicism is built on examination, and you cannot examine something you have pushed away. The Stoic aim is to understand the beliefs that give rise to destructive emotions and to correct those beliefs, not to bury the feelings they produce. Good emotions, grounded in accurate judgments and virtuous action, are actively cultivated in Stoicism.
What do the Stoics mean when they say emotions are judgments?
For the Stoics, emotions are not random events that happen to us. They arise from the beliefs we hold about what is good or bad for us. When we judge a situation as threatening, dangerous, or unjust, the corresponding emotion follows from that judgment. This means that if the underlying belief is false or inaccurate, the emotion that arises from it is also built on a falsehood. Changing the belief changes the emotional response over time.
What is the difference between a pre-emotion and a full emotion in Stoicism?
A pre-emotion, or propatheia, is the involuntary first movement that happens before we have made any judgment: the physical jolt, the initial quickening of the heart, the flash of unease. These are natural and even the Stoic sage experiences them. They become a full emotion only when we attach a judgment to them, when we tell ourselves what the event means, and then assent to that interpretation. The Stoic practice targets the moment between the pre-emotion and the judgment.
How can I use my emotions as information?
After an emotional reaction, ask three questions: what actually happened, stripped of interpretation? What did I add to it, and why did this particular event feel significant to me? And what does that tell me about my beliefs, fears, or values? The emotion itself is not the problem. It is pointing at a belief worth examining. Once we identify that belief, we have something to work with, either to confirm it is accurate or to begin questioning whether it is.
Does practicing Stoicism make you emotionally cold?
The opposite tends to happen. When we stop being overwhelmed by reactions we do not understand, we become more present and more genuinely available to the people around us. Stoic practice does not remove feeling. It changes our relationship to feeling, making it clearer, less reactive, and more honest. Many people who practice Stoicism consistently report becoming better listeners and more genuinely connected to others, not less.
The Emotions Are Still There
What your emotions are trying to tell you is not that something is wrong with you. They are pointing at beliefs you have about the world, beliefs formed through experience, conditioning, and the particular life you have lived. Some of those beliefs are accurate. Some are not. The Stoic practice is to find out which is which.
The emotions do not disappear with practice. They become lighter, less all-consuming, less likely to take over completely. Not because we have pushed them away, but because we understand them better. And in that understanding, we recover the ability to act well, even in difficult moments, even when things are not going the way we wanted.
As long as we act in accordance with who we are and what we value, not driven by destructive passions but not cold and unfeeling either, we can see the world more clearly and live in it more honestly. That is what the Stoics were pointing toward. Not a life without feeling. A life where feeling serves us rather than rules us.
Watch the full episode on YouTube.
Want to Learn More?
If this resonated and you are ready to start building your own philosophy of life, a conversation with Benny as your Stoic coach can be a good place to begin. Not to be told what to think, but to have the space to figure it out. You can also sign up for the newsletter, The Pause, or watch or listen to the Via Stoica Podcast on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple Podcasts.
About the Author
Benny Voncken is the founder of Via Stoica and host of the Via Stoica Podcast. He has practiced Stoicism as a way of life for over six years, spoken at Stoicon, and led Stoic walks across Europe. Through Stoic coaching, he helps people use Stoic principles and practices to develop their own philosophy of life: one that gives them the tools to face obstacles, navigate change, and find more balance and peace. He writes, teaches, and walks wherever the philosophy takes him.
Comments 0